Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation

Hi Roger,

> From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
> Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 04/30/2013 01:26 PM
> Subject: Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete 
> description of members is  included in LDPC representation
> 
> My preference would be for option D (I was convinced by Pierre-
> Antoine's argumentation a few weeks ago). 
> 
> But, I don't see why the language has to be so container specific. 
> For me this is one of those features where LDP is helping with 
> reading of any kind of Linked Data.
> 
> regards, 
> Roger

What else would you propose?
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group