W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: LDP Minutes for April 22

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:27:30 -0400
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF960AC8AE.1B4FD0ED-ON85257B5C.0048599D-85257B5C.0049EEB2@us.ibm.com>
> Exactly, MacTed swayed me to his cause with this compelling argument as 

I find no trace of the argument or ptr to same in the transcript - you are 
such teases.  While I have no objection to the resolution, seems that we'd 
want to record the particularly persuasive points.

> Ashok Malhotra: Option 1 may cut off an option for recursive delete 

At this point in the transcript "option 1" (sic) and "option 2" (sic) 
appear, although "option A" also continues to be used depending on the 
speaker.  I'm guessing that 1=a, 2=b, and A=a but would like minutes 
clarified.  I could just as easily guess that 1=A.1, 2=A.2, A=a from the 
evidence in Issue-59 and the email related to it in the minutes.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario

From:   Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
To:     public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
Date:   04/22/2013 01:24 PM
Subject:        LDP Minutes for April 22

Now available for review: 

I'm looking for the full name and affiliation of SimpsonTP. Any info 
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 13:28:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:39 UTC