- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:15:48 +0200
- To: <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Cc: <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 12 Jul 2012, at 10:33, <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > the concrete reason i am asking is that we are very interested in using > linked data as a platform, but we also cannot go the route of a shared > database model. we must have control over what a linked data platform > exposes and what it does not expose, and we must have control over who can > add what and when to a linked data platform. these are the questions we > need to solve, and i am still trying to figure out how to best solve those > questions in the context of this WG. In my view the best way to do that is to use WebID for authentication ( see video at http://webid.info/ and the spec at http://webid.info/spec ) and access control ontologies as for example demonstrated in the README on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/read-write-web/ An example of an ACL rule written in Turtle is https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/read-write-web/file/cff4d0159b26/test_www/.meta.n3.off The advantage of WebID is it ties right into LinkedData and you can use it to build webs of trust. I am working on building much more interesting demonstrations. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 12:16:25 UTC