- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 16:56:02 +0200
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:58:26 UTC
Looking at how the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol (GPS) and Basic Profile (BP) submission compare, the most obvious difference I see is the fact GPS primarily deals with "graphs" while BP deals with Basic Profile Resources and Containers. So, I'd like to ask whether considering a BPR as a graph would, at least to some extend, provide some alignment between the two specs. I think two aspects need to be considered: 1) what URL is used, 2) what triples are returned. Thoughts? -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:58:26 UTC