- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:02:54 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5036623E.905@openlinksw.com>
All, Of late, I've been writing a series of posts [1][2][3] that demonstrate why Turtle is such an important syntax for crafting RDF documents. Basically, its solves the biggest challenges to Linked Data comprehension which include the following: 1. triple visibility 2. triple comprehension. Historically, RDF/XML was an utter dud re. the above. History will record this as one of the biggest snafus of an era. By that I mean, putting such a misguided syntax at the front door of something so important. Once you get beyond triple visibility and comprehension, the next challenge for Linked Data is deployment. Historically, this effort has been mired by the following: 1. domain name ownership 2. web server ownership and/or access -- with admin level privileges for URL re-write rules 3. httpRange-14 -- basically the permathread about disambiguating names that denote web documents and entities in general . The unanswered question re. Linked Data deployment used to be: how could an end-user deploy Linked Data without encountering the road blocks outlined above. Unfortunately, that question was never answered emphatically so we ended up with the detrimental misconception that DIY Linked Data deployment wasn't possible, basically you needs a platform or expensive consulting engagements to get going. As history will note, the model failed. Yes, we have close to 55 Billion+ triples in the LOD cloud, but the subject matter remains an artificial mystery because all of those triples are generated via platforms or the combination of platforms and projects. Back to my opening comments, I've created a number of posts that demonstrate how you can use Turtle as an effective vehicle for DIY-style Linked Data deployment that works for: end-users, integrators (plumbers), and programmers. These examples range from basic profile documents all the way up to Web-scale verifiable identity via the WebID authentication protocol. To repeat the obvious, there are no reasons to expose RDF/XML to folks encountering Linked Data for the first time. My company has built 100+ transformers/cartridges [4] for a massive collection of data formats and web services, none of that would ever lead me to putting RDF/XML at the front door of any Linked Data narrative. Links: 1. http://bit.ly/NYwGCd -- simple Turtle based profile document usable by anyone that can fill in placeholders and save a document 2. http://bit.ly/LNIeLj -- simple DIY-style Linked Data deployment via Dropbox, Skydrive, Google Drive, Box.NET, and Amazon S3 buckets 3. http://bit.ly/O4LNKf - how to create and control you own verifiable digital identity, at Web-Scale via a simple Turtle document using the WebID authentication protocol . 4. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/sponger_setup.vsp -- cartridge/transformer sample list 5. http://bit.ly/Q4ffou -- how RDF transformers/cartridges work. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:01:31 UTC