- From: Reza B'far <reza.bfar@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 07:40:06 -0700
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Folks How about we put some of these to vote as individual axioms? So, of the group agrees, I'll send out individual proposals for axioms that will have 1-2 sentences and folks can vote with the traditional +1/-1/0? I think such axioms can give us the proper technical constraints around the use-cases if approved Best On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > hello kingsley. > > On 2012-08-07 16:17 , "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> Modulo RDF re. your comments above, since it isn't a format, a media >> type still boils down to an entity-attribute-value or attribute=value >> structure i.e., 3-tuple or 2-tuple. It just documents the fact in prose >> as part of the mime type. > > i really don' understand how you get to this conclusion. look at the IETF > registry of media types and you'll see an amazingly wide array of all > kinds of models and metamodels people have registered. you find trees, > maybe jeni has even bothered to register her LMNL "overlapping tree" > format, and all kinds of more generalized or more specialized data models. > what brings you to the conclusion that media types are in one of these two > simple classes you are listing? the media type world is so much more > colorful than that. > > i guess i'll stop wasting mailing list bandwidth for now, since you're > going to be on vacation and nobody else seems to get engaged in this > debate anyway. i am still failing to see, though, where those assertions > you are making are coming from, and for my personal vocabulary management, > i'll conclude that > > - there is the "Linked Data is based on RDF" perspective which is shared > by most people, then > - there's the "linked data is just data that's linked on the web" > perspective of ashok that i also had for a while, and then > - there's your "Linked Data is not RDF, but EAV" perspective, that is not > something i had heard of before. > > cheers, > > dret. > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 14:41:26 UTC