Re: LDP Implementation Report for LDP4j

Hi Nandana,

I've updated the WG report
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html

Regards,
Steve Speicher
http://stevespeicher.me

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> Here I've attached an updated version of the implementation report which
> now includes the results for the Direct Container and Indirect Container
> tests.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nandana,
>>
>> This report [1] has been incorporated into the WG conformation report [2].
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://github.com/w3c/ldp-testsuite/blob/gh-pages/report/contrib/ldp4j/ldp-testsuite-execution-report-earl.ttl
>> [2]:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#subj_7
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve Speicher
>> http://stevespeicher.me
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
>> nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've attached the implementation report for LDP4j [1] herewith. This
>>> report covers the MUST, SHOULD, and MAY requirements of the LDP
>>> specification for RDF Resources and Basic Containers. LDP4j passes all the
>>> MUST requirements of RDF Sources and 35/37 MUST requirements of Basic
>>> Containers.
>>>
>>> We currently don't support resources creation using PUT, PATCH method,
>>> and Slug header. We will send an updated report which includes the results
>>> for Direct Containers once the testing is completed on those.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Nandana
>>>
>>> [1] - http://www.ldp4j.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 01:28:17 UTC