- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:47:37 -0400
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-ldp-comments <public-ldp-comments@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 October 2014 01:48:05 UTC
Hi Nandana, This report [1] has been incorporated into the WG conformation report [2]. [1]: https://github.com/w3c/ldp-testsuite/blob/gh-pages/report/contrib/ldp4j/ldp-testsuite-execution-report-earl.ttl [2]: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#subj_7 Thanks, Steve Speicher http://stevespeicher.me On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya < nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've attached the implementation report for LDP4j [1] herewith. This > report covers the MUST, SHOULD, and MAY requirements of the LDP > specification for RDF Resources and Basic Containers. LDP4j passes all the > MUST requirements of RDF Sources and 35/37 MUST requirements of Basic > Containers. > > We currently don't support resources creation using PUT, PATCH method, and > Slug header. We will send an updated report which includes the results for > Direct Containers once the testing is completed on those. > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > [1] - http://www.ldp4j.org/ >
Received on Friday, 17 October 2014 01:48:05 UTC