Re: Improved LDP Test Report for Callimachus

Thanks, Steve!

We hope that this report and the comments sent to the public-ldp-wg list regarding our rationale for IndirectContainers helps the WG to make a decision to keep IndirectContainers.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Oct 15, 2014, at 10:48, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi James,
> 
> No problem. Report has been updated: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#indirectcontainer-must
> 
> - Steve
> 
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Thanks for the feed back. I have updated the earl report per your
> suggestions and attached it to this email.
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 10:12 -0400, Steve Speicher wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:49 AM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
> > wrote:
> >         Hi all,
> >
> >         We understand that the current Callimachus test report at [1]
> >         suggests that we are still missing three (3) IndirectContainer
> >         tests that are MUSTs. They are:
> >         - IndirectContainer-CreateIndirectContainer
> > There appears to be missing an earl:Assertion for this one ^
> >
> >         - IndirectContainer-ContainsLdpcUri
> >         - IndirectContainer-PostResource
> > There are 2 earl:Assertion entries for this test ^ (assuming copy and
> > paste error)
> >
> >
> >         We have tested all three of these manually and claim 100%
> >         compliance on the MUST IndirectContainer tests.  However, we
> >         aren’t sure how to construct the earl report so that is
> >         correctly reflected.
> >
> >         Another earl report is attached, but the earl:mode for these
> >         three tests is earl:notTested. Can someone tell us how to edit
> >         this to mark them correctly as tested and passed?
> > I'd set:
> >      earl:mode earl:manual;
> >
> >
> > Optionally, it would be good to add also a triple to the earl:result
> > (see other earl:manual test assertions) with predicate
> > dcterms:description to explain your testing, even if just to say it
> > was manually tested.
> >
> 
> 
>