- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:15:07 +0200
- To: public-ldp-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 21:15:54 UTC
Hi, On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org> wrote: > > On 10/09/2014 04:06 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > > > > I'm fine with that being the expected behavior, but I'd just like us to > > agree that /is/ the expected behavior :) > > Fair enough! :) > > Maybe we can nudge one of the editors to make this clarification? (at > least to the primer) *wink* *wink* > We can clarify it in the primer if necessary. At the time of the writing, we didn't think someone would use the RDF content to give hints on what resources to be created. Even when answering the previous email I misread the question and just thought of how the relative URI is resolved but not whether it has any effect on resource creation. Best Regards, Nandana
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 21:15:54 UTC