- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:08:41 -0400
- To: public-ldp-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7Joe-AUHSX7yUwwfuBfdd-A1=osZjJT8ynvzY-9LmUmnpA@mail.gmail.com>
Per the LDP Test Cases [1] document, I am submitting our results [2] for the LDP.js server implementation (source not yet public), running instance at [3] (no guarantees it will be up or when we shut it down, esp. if abused). We ran with 1 configuration for BasicContainer and 1 configuration for DirectContainer, resulting in 2 different results [2]. We don't have support for non-RDF Sources, though plan to add it. The WG summary report [4] has also been updated to reflect these results. Currently we don't mark one test case as passed (even though we support the requirement) since the test hasn't been written. So technically it would/should pass 100% of the MUSTs for DirectContainers. Some additional information about the approach to the implementation can be found at [5]. [1]: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/ldp-testsuite.html [2]: https://github.com/w3c/ldp-testsuite/tree/gh-pages/report/contrib [3]: http://ldpjs.mybluemix.net [4]: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html [5]: http://stevespeicher.blogspot.com/2014/08/from-zero-to-ldp-tale-of-our-5-day.html Thanks, Steve Speicher http://stevespeicher.me
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 15:09:12 UTC