- From: Martin Nally <nally@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:58:15 -0400
- To: public-ldp-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 21:59:43 UTC
We've reviewed the 11 March 2014 of draft of LDP [1] and are converting our previous implementation based on the submission to conform to the new draft. We have some feedback: 1) Definition of "membership triples" seems limiting in saying LDP-RS' state must hold the membership triples. In our implementation, the membership triple is held in a graph assigned to the member resource. Suggestion is to adjust the definition to allow for this perhaps common implementation case. 2) Confusing examples (3-5) [2], there needs to be a bit more description between these. It would be helpful to add some narrative between them, as well as showing POST example. 3) General comment/feedback, it would be quite useful to have more examples. Developers will really heavily on them for comprehension, perhaps even more that the normative text. [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/ [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/#ldpc-informative Best regards, Martin Martin Nally, IBM Fellow and VP, IBM Rational tel: +1 (714)472-2690
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 21:59:43 UTC