Comments on March 2014 of draft of LDP

We've reviewed the 11 March 2014 of draft of LDP [1] and are converting 
our previous implementation based on the submission to conform to the new 
draft. We have some feedback:

1) Definition of "membership triples" seems limiting in saying LDP-RS' 
state must hold the membership triples.  In our implementation, the 
membership triple is held in a graph assigned to the member resource.
Suggestion is to adjust the definition to allow for this perhaps common 
implementation case.

2) Confusing examples (3-5) [2], there needs to be a bit more description 
between these.  It would be helpful to add some narrative between them, as 
well as showing POST example.

3) General comment/feedback, it would be quite useful to have more 
examples.  Developers will really heavily on them for comprehension, 
perhaps even more that the normative text.

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/#ldpc-informative

Best regards, Martin

Martin Nally, IBM Fellow and VP,
IBM Rational
tel: +1 (714)472-2690

Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 21:59:43 UTC