Re: Re: Comments on LDP TR http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130730/ ( LC-2839)

 Dear Tim Berners-Lee ,

The Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Linked Data Platform 1.0
published on 30 Jul 2013. Thank you for having taken the time to review the
document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-ldp-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 22 November
2013. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group,
Eric Prud'hommeaux
Yves Lafon
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/34BE20B3-86E3-434F-B454-B004E9A338F0@w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/


=====

Your comment on :
> 4.10.1 
> "The triples in the representation of the each page are typically a
> subset of the triples in the resource - same subject, predicate and
> object."  Same triples then? eh?  
> 
> 
> I prefer the word "inspect" for the way "introspect" is used in the
> document.
> "Introspection" is normally looking into oneself, not into something
> else.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2839):
Changed the offending text to clarify intent and use inspect rather than
introspect per Tim's recommendation.

----

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 23:53:55 UTC