Re: W3C day at 4th Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK-2023, Sep 13, Vienna, Austria)

Dear all,

as we don't find a slot for all interested participants to attend, I
suggest two calls.

The first would be Mo, December 5, 2022, 12-1 PM (Europe/Zurich)
Link: https://meet.google.com/zzg-jkjm-rzy

The second would be Thu, December 8, 2022, 12-1 PM (Europe/Zurich)
Link: tba. via agenda/minutes document, see below

We had a preparatory call with Jorge and Fahad, and aside from organizing
the next OntoLex face-to-face meeting, it seems necessary to also discuss
whether and to what extent to broaden the scope to include aspects of other
W3C CGs and to discuss their relations with OntoLex.

Agenda/minutes document under
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OYupkE_vnZisQCVarYoqfIgnLQTD727kez7lRNAbNhE/edit?usp=sharing
.

See you soon!
Christian

Am Mo., 28. Nov. 2022 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Christian Chiarcos <
christian.chiarcos@gmail.com>:

> Dear all,
>
> apologies for being quiet for some time. Our workshop at LDK-2021 in
> Zaragoza has been quite a success, but afterwards, we lost a bit of
> momentum -- for my part mostly because I wanted to wrap up OntoLex-FrAC (
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Frequency,_Attestation_and_Corpus_Information)
> before seriously addressing annotations. Apologies for not communicating
> this properly, but as FrAC and the LD4LT annotation discussion have some
> overlap and FrAC seemed almost ready for release back then (it is even
> closer now, but still not there yet), I thought we avoid some redundancies
> and irritations by not developing these two things in parallel. In fact the
> devision of labour between both efforts has been questioned several times,
> as FrAC also involves annotated corpora and we might use the chance of an
> upcoming OntoLex meeting to discuss exactly that.
>
> For LDK-2023 in Vienna (
> http://2023.ldk-conf.org/call-for-workshops-and-tutorials/), we are
> currently preparing a proposal for an OntoLex workshop. While this doesn't
> directly involve LD4LT, I was wondering about having a joint session in
> that workshop on OntoLex-FrAC and the LD4LT annotation harmonization
> initiative, as the latter is a natural follow-up to FrAC. In case you're
> interested to participate in such a session, please feel free to join the
> preparation call and to participate in the Doodle poll (
> https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/er8nAW2b).
>
> Similarly, and especially in the light of novel metadata vocabularies
> especially for lexical resources, we might also consider to discuss other
> topics close to LD4LT there, e.g., the METASHARE OWL ontology and LexMeta (
> https://zenodo.org/record/6897062#.Y4SI3Pso9H4).
>
> Best,
> Christian
>