W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ld4lt@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [ld4lt] namespace for the model of language resources

From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:08:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CANzuSaObwXgpzHZ1=Ju5X9TrL1BQMnkmn9Kmk9KZnDsuwXEHYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John P. McCrae" <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Marta Villegas <marta.villegas@gmail.com>, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>, public-ld4lt@w3.org
Hi all,

2015-01-22 12:56 GMT+01:00 John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:

> I agree with Marta, purl.org is best, although I would rather redirect to
> a service that does RDF properly (content negotiation etc., nice HTML
> version)
>
+1


> LingHub: This is really lider-project.eu... I have had bad experience with
> the longevity of project URLs
>

In that case the "lider-project.eu" part should not be included in the
namespace of course

Regards,
Jorge


>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Marta Villegas <marta.villegas@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> from our experience:
>>
>> purl.org is nice as it gives you a persintent URI which you redirect
>> whenever you want BUT we redirected to github (to allow for community
>> edition, versioning etc). Github uses https and Protege has problems with
>> https
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-22 10:02 GMT+01:00 Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
>> :
>>
>>>  El 21/01/2015 13:19, Jorge Gracia escribió:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>  During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the
>>> following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose for
>>> the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?"
>>>
>>> The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at
>>> http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl  An alternative namespace has to
>>> be found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in place.
>>> There are several alternatives:
>>> -  Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata)
>>> -  Linghub-based namespace
>>> -  purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs)
>>>
>>> --> I think this is for the moment the most flexible, but not the best...
>>>
>>>  -  LD4LT-based namespace
>>>
>>> --> Who is responsible for this namespace?
>>>
>>>  -  W3C-based namespace
>>> - Other?
>>>
>>>  All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send
>>> your opinion around or to add further alternatives.
>>>
>>>  May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of
>>> tomorrow's telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think)
>>>
>>>  Best regards,
>>>
>>>  --
>>>  Jorge Gracia, PhD
>>> Ontology Engineering Group
>>> Artificial Intelligence Department
>>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
>>> D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
>>> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
>>> Facultad de Informática
>>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>>
>>> Campus de Montegancedo s/n
>>> Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
>>> Tel. (+34) 91336 3672
>>> Skype: vroddon3
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marta Villegas
>> marta.villegas@gmail.com
>>
>
>

-- 
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 12:09:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:11 UTC