Re: [ld4lt] MetaShare OWL metamodel: first steps from Philipp Cimiano on 2014-05-08 (public-ld4lt@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 07:49:36 +0200
To: Penny Labropoulou <penny@ilsp.gr>, 'Andreas Blumauer' <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at>
CC: public-ld4lt@w3.org
Message-ID: <536B1AF0.4040404@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear Andreas,

combing back to this. You mentioned in your email: "When classifying 
linguistic resources by that schema, one can find potential datasets 
quicker."

It would help a lot if you could give concrete examples of the kind of 
resources that you would like to find. And in particular of the type of 
"queries" you would like to issue.

Would it be possible for you to provide some examples?

I can then help to narrate a use case for the LD4LT site.

Best regards,

Philipp.

Am 24.04.14 11:03, schrieb Penny Labropoulou:
>
> Dear Andreas and all,
>
> As regards the second topic you are mentioning, I would like to point 
> out that in META-SHARE, we have taken into consideration the issues 
> you are mentioning – albeit improvements might be needed. I am giving 
> you here the link to the component that best corresponds to your query 
> – the link goes to the documentation of the original xml schema):
>
> - application scenarios supported (e.g. sentiment analysis, content 
> classification, ...)
>
> foreseenUseInfo: 
> http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Foreseenuseinfo
>
> - supported languages
>
> languageInfo 
> (http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Languageinfo) and 
> lingualityInfo 
> (http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Lingualityinfo)
>
> - topicality
>
> There are various components for the "classification" information, 
> depending on the mediaType of the resource, e.g. 
> textClassificationInfo 
> (http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Textclassificationinfo) & 
> audioClassificationInfo 
> (http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Audioclassificationinfo)
>
> - license, price model
>
> distributionInfo 
> (http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Distributioninfo) may 
> include one more licenceInfo with speficic information on licensing 
> and pricing
>
> - used by (e.g. example use cases)
>
> actualUseInfo: 
> http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Actualuseinfo
>
> Any comments are welcome! And, if needed, I can provide further 
> explanations.
>
> Best,
>
> Penny Labropoulou
>
> *From:*Andreas Blumauer [mailto:a.blumauer@semantic-web.at]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:37 AM
> *To:* Philipp Cimiano
> *Cc:* public-ld4lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ld4lt] MetaShare OWL metamodel: first steps
>
> Dear Philipp, dear all,
>
> this is what I was thinking of, I'd like to write up a list like that,
>
> is there a shared space we can collaborate on this? A GDoc?
>
> Besides http://linguistics.okfn.org/resources/llod/ and 
> http://datahub.io/dataset?tags=linguistics - are there any other 
> collections of relevant linguistic sources you usually look up?
>
> The second topic I was mentioning was a schema which describes 
> linguistic resources from a pragmatic point of view, e.g.:
>
> - application scenarios supported (e.g. sentiment analysis, content 
> classification, ...)
>
> - supported languages
>
> - topicality
>
> - license, price model
>
> - used by (e.g. example use cases)
>
> When classifying linguistic resources by that schema, one can find 
> potential datasets quicker.
>
> Is something like that already in place?
>
> BTW: Is there a programme for MLODE 2014 somewhere online yet?
>
> Talk to you soon,
>
> Andreas
>
> 2014-04-24 10:20 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano 
> <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de 
> <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>:
>
>     Dear Jorge, all,
>
>      thanks for sharing this with us. I would like to follow up on an
>     interesting comment that Andreas Blumauer from the SW Company made
>     on our last meeting (Andreas: I assume you are on this list?).
>
>     Andreas mentioned the importance of being able to discover
>     relevant and appropriate ressources. This use case is core for the
>     LIDER project in which many people here are involved and I think
>     it would be great to have some more specific requirements on this.
>     These requirements might then end up as a use case in a
>     deliverable of LIDER and thus be part of our roadmap. In addition,
>     we would try to support the corresponding use case at a technical
>     level.
>
>     In order to get this started, it would be great to have some more
>     specific examples of what Andreas had in mind.
>
>     Andreas: would you be willing to provide us some examples of
>     particular needs in the form of pseudo-queries, e.g. "I need to
>     find a lexicon in the German language on a particular domain
>     etc.". That would be very helpful. I can try to narrate the whole
>     thing into a coherent piece of text that can end up in one of the
>     LIDER deliverables on relevant business cases.
>
>     Btw. Jorge and myself will be visiting the Metashare people at UPF
>     tomorrow, so if there is anything that this group wants as to
>     clarify there, please let us know latest today ;-)
>
>     Thanks and best regards,
>
>     Philipp.
>
>     Am 23.04.14 13:11, schrieb Jorge Gracia:
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         In our first telco I took the action of starting the
>         discussion about the new OWL/RDF version of the MetaShare
>         metadata model for documenting Language Resources. For the
>         moment I have created a space in the wiki to start collecting
>         information and related pointers. See
>         https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/wiki/Main_Page#OWL_Metamodel_for_Language_Resources
>
>         We have to decide how to proceed for editing collaboratively
>         the ontology in a simple way. I see three options here (feel
>         free to propose others):
>
>         - use WebProtege (http://webprotege.stanford.edu/)
>
>         - use the ld4lt wiki
>
>         - use Github
>
>         Each one has its pros/cons. We can analyse them and take a
>         decision in the next telco.
>
>         The starting point will be the ontology already developed at
>         Universitat Pompeu Fabra, which can be found at
>         http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl
>
>         @Dave: do I have to register this activity as an issue in the
>         tracking system? http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/options
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         -- 
>         Jorge Gracia, PhD
>         Ontology Engineering Group
>         Artificial Intelligence Department
>         Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>         http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/
>         <http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/%7Ejgracia/>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>       
>
>     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>
>       
>
>     Phone:+49 521 106 12249  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>
>     Fax:+49 521 106 12412  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012412>
>
>     Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de  <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>       
>
>     Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
>
>     Raum 2.307
>
>     Universität Bielefeld
>
>     Inspiration 1
>
>     33619 Bielefeld
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Andreas Blumauer, MSc IT
> Managing Director & CEO
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreasblumauer
>
> Semantic Web Company GmbH
> Mariahilfer Straße 70 / 8
> A - 1070 Vienna, Austria
>
> http://www.semantic-web.at
> http://www.poolparty-software.com
>
> Phone (Austria): +43-1-402123527
> Phone (US): +1 (415) 800-3776
> Mobile: +43-676-9234162
> skype:blumauerpunkt
>


-- 

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universität Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 05:50:08 UTC