- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:24:48 +0100
- To: public-lbd@w3.org
Following my question on elevators, I would like to share thoughts that may (or may not?) lead to a small reform of the BOT ontology. Consider boats: they can be true floating houses. They may have storeys, bedrooms, kitchen, bathrooms, electrical system, plumbing, heating system, and so on. They for sure qualify as entities that BOT would be good at modelling. Yet, they are mobile, and they are vehicles. Going further, trains are vehicles that countain toilets, cabines, possibly retaurants, sometimes bedrooms, even storeys, etc. They should be zones with spaces. Going further, an inter-terminal shuttle in an airport, being a train itself, could be modelled as a zone with spaces inside. But from the point of view of the airport, an inter-terminal shuttle is just like an elevator: an element that moves along a space that crosses several zones. A terminal is like a storey, except that it's not physically on top or below other terminals. Considering the answers I had about elevator, the shuttle should be modelled as a bot:Element of the airport. But as I said, it could equally be a zone. From the point of view of the airport topology, the train is an element, while from its own internal perspective, the train is a zone with its own spaces. So, this leads to my prooposal: coudn't we remove the disjointess axiom that currently holds between bot:Element and bot:Zone? BTW, from the perspective of a 3D simulation application, it makes sense to navigate larger zones with elements that are themselves zones, because as soon as one enters a local element, the element becomes the reference frame and everything external can be ignored until going out of the element. This allows the application to handle very large zones as well as fine grained areas without performance issues. BTW (2nd), the encapsuation of zones within elements leas to a hierarchical model of the environment that matches very well an abstract model for indoor navigation that a former student of mine proposed in his PhD dissertation. BTW (3rd): think of a doll-house. It is an element in a child's bedroom, and a building with storeys and rooms. -- Antoine Zimmermann Institut Henri Fayol École des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel CS 62362 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/ Member of team Connected Intelligence, Laboratoire Hubert Curien
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 14:25:13 UTC