follow up on TOOLS - what is your opinion?

Dear all,
Last but not least, our ideas about the next steps about tools and evaluation methods.

We suggest
 • waiting for results from use cases discussion before proceeding further with discussions on how the use cases may reflect on the data
 • organizing a smaller group to discuss on methods for evaluating and comparing tools
 • organizing a smaller group on a set of new test cases that could be considered for heterogeneous data beyond what was already proposed for R2RML and was translated for heterogeneous data (https://github.com/RMLio/rml-test-cases). The idea is then, similarly to mapping languages, that people can write down their approach of tackling the challenge as a scientific paper.
 • organizing a smaller group to revive and keep it alive a new R2RML implementation report (https://github.com/kg-construct/r2rml-implementation-report) 

The different options do not exclude each other!

We welcome comments on the suggestions, proposals on how to proceed and of course intend of participation in any of the two above.


Best regards,
David

David Chaves
PhD Student
Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid