- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:06:53 -0400
- To: "Korkan, Ege" <ege.korkan@siemens.com>
- Cc: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>, "team-wot@w3.org" <team-wot@w3.org>, "public-json-ld-wg@w3.org" <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>, public-rch-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:53 PM Korkan, Ege <ege.korkan@siemens.com> wrote: > Thank you for the detailed answers! I really appreciate all the pointers. I will wait for others to comment but we can summarize all the points into a slideset or md file to drive the discussion. I will answer to the technical points later on and focus on the meeting slot to agree on something before the holiday season starts. Ok, sounds good. > If the JSON-LD CG will not meet, I would propose this slot. The WoT WG/IG has a call tomorrow where such topics are discussed, and I can mention this as a possible meeting slot. We can wait for VCWG input for a joint session before finalizing the slot. The RDF Dataset Canonicalization and Hash Working Group met today, which has a number of the people that would be interested in the topics you listed in attendance. Our agenda for W3C TPAC is fairly easy -- we plan to transition into the Candidate Recommendation phase, have no substantial issues to discuss, and so the Chairs of the RCH WG offered to set aside part of the 3 hour meeting schedule for a joint WoT/RCH meeting (with people from the JSON-LD, Data Integrity, and Verifiable Credentials communities in attendance). See the top of the minutes from today for an explanation: https://www.w3.org/2023/07/25-rch-minutes.html I'm CC'ing that WG so that the Chairs from both groups can coordinate, if that is a desired option. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 18:07:34 UTC