Re: Fate of JSON-LD 1.0

+1


Harold Solbrig


From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 2:04 PM
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>, W3C Chairs of JSON-LD WG <group-json-ld-wg-chairs@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Fate of JSON-LD 1.0
Resent-From: <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 2:03 PM


      External Email - Use Caution




I think we should supersede 1.0.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net<mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>


On Aug 25, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:

Something that we all forgot to properly deal with: what should exactly be the status of JSON-LD 1.0? Should it be considered as formally superseded, and marked it as such in the /TR document?

If that is the case then, alas!, we will have to go through a formal procedure of asking for that change and get it accepted by the AC. Is there any reason why _not_ to do that?

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2FIvan%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csolbrig%40jhu.edu%7C404679a0ad0449e28c7808d84929b275%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C637339790731507294&sdata=FszFYR4ytD9Q73VmrV8x2ki%2BTb7QLTiH26aEOR7R2%2Bo%3D&reserved=0>
mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Forcid.org%2F0000-0003-0782-2704&data=02%7C01%7Csolbrig%40jhu.edu%7C404679a0ad0449e28c7808d84929b275%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C637339790731517287&sdata=xmUWk7RedPKFrSxy%2FB03KvWp4GLp2xHxuRhg1N1ut7U%3D&reserved=0>