On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 20:00, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com> wrote:
>
> That actually patches the graph (and is cross format) vs. patching the
> representation of the graph.
>
Exactly
>
> It could probably do with a JSON-LD representation, though.
>
Amiright, Pierre-Antoine? ;)
>
This would not be straightforward, since LD-Patch is not encoded as an RDF
graph -- it has its own internal model, which is basically a sequence of
patching operations.
But I guess we could work on a flavour of LD-Patch which
* uses JSON-LD to describe the triples in each operation, or even
* uses JSON to encode the whole document...
best
>
> Cheers!
> Benjamin
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, November 18, 2019 1:37 PM
> *To:* W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Using PATCH on JSON-LD?
>
>
> Have anyone used JSON Patch (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902) on
> JSON-LD? Are there any concerns about `@context` in this case? What
> about schemas and validation?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leonard
>
>
>