- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:09:02 +0000
- To: "public-json-ld-wg@w3.org" <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN7PR06MB5154749656D049F3717B1CD8B27B0@BN7PR06MB5154.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Dear all, The JSON-LD regular call is *today*, Friday November 8th, at the regular **in the USA** time of 12 noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. The details to join are available here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-json-ld-wg/2018Jun/0000.html The primary objective of today's call is to understand getting our specs to Candidate Recommendation and setting up the Call for Consensus process. Regrets: Rob Agenda: * Scribe Selection * Approve minutes of previous call: https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-11-01-json-ld * Announcements / Reminders? * Logistics: * Call for Consensus for Candidate Recommendation How do we do this? Ivan? ;) * Issues: * Media types for json-ld https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/287 Status report...though Rob is away * Terms starting with ":" https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/189 Proposal: Does not match the "includes a colon" for term processing See Also https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/195 and PR https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/203 * Dealing with other people's `@` prefixed terms (i.e. OData) https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/188 * Absolute IRI terminology https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/288 Proposal: Use "IRI" for "absolute IRI", "relative IRI reference" for "relative IRI" * AOB * Adjourn Many thanks, and talk *very* soon, Benjamin Co-Chair, W3C JSON-LD WG -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
Received on Friday, 8 November 2019 16:09:07 UTC