- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:09:02 +0000
- To: "public-json-ld-wg@w3.org" <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN7PR06MB5154749656D049F3717B1CD8B27B0@BN7PR06MB5154.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Dear all,
The JSON-LD regular call is *today*, Friday November 8th, at the regular **in the USA** time of 12 noon Eastern, 9am Pacific.
The details to join are available here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-json-ld-wg/2018Jun/0000.html
The primary objective of today's call is to understand getting our specs to Candidate Recommendation and setting up the Call for Consensus process.
Regrets: Rob
Agenda:
* Scribe Selection
* Approve minutes of previous call:
https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-11-01-json-ld
* Announcements / Reminders?
* Logistics:
* Call for Consensus for Candidate Recommendation
How do we do this? Ivan? ;)
* Issues:
* Media types for json-ld
https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/287
Status report...though Rob is away
* Terms starting with ":"
https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/189
Proposal: Does not match the "includes a colon" for term processing
See Also https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/195
and PR https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/203
* Dealing with other people's `@` prefixed terms (i.e. OData)
https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/188
* Absolute IRI terminology
https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/288
Proposal: Use "IRI" for "absolute IRI", "relative IRI reference" for "relative IRI"
* AOB
* Adjourn
Many thanks, and talk *very* soon,
Benjamin
Co-Chair, W3C JSON-LD WG
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
Received on Friday, 8 November 2019 16:09:07 UTC