Re: WD Update delayed

Actually, there was a build failure. I re-ran it and success! Thanks so much for your help. 

Gregg Kellogg
Sent from my iPhone

> On May 9, 2019, at 9:27 PM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> Great suggestion, but it’s still failing. The fact that it things its
>> using Specberus and not ReSpec is telling.
> 
> I think Specberus is in general always running.. (see e.g., a successful WD publication of the Publishing WG [1])
> 
> When comparing their status report [2] to ours [3] I noticed that in our latest failed attempt "thisVersion" still contains a ; instead of &.
> 
> "thisVersion": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD;shortName=json-ld11-json-ld11-20190509/",
> 
> so I checked https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/ECHIDNA and saw that it still contains a ; instead of & ...
> 
> I think you've only pushed your changes to the publication branch, but not the main branch where Specberus seems to fetch the ECHIDNA file from..
> 
> br simon
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2019Apr/0006.html
> [2] https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=fec173dd-c037-44ff-905d-b6d5d0d6b471
> [3] https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=1504c6f3-3516-4e4d-a832-5de8a5dfd1f2
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
> 
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
> 
> Am 2019-05-09 07:58, schrieb Gregg Kellogg:
>> Great suggestion, but it’s still failing. The fact that it things its
>> using Specberus and not ReSpec is telling.
>> Gregg Kellogg
>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>> On May 8, 2019, at 10:49 PM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
>>> apparently yes.. they changed from ; to & on 5th of March (see https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna-with-ReSpec-and-GitHub/_history)
>>> br simon
>>> ---
>>> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
>>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>>> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>>> Am 2019-05-09 07:47, schrieb Gregg Kellogg:
>>>> Thanks for the suggestion, I’ll give it a shot. It worked on the last
>>>> release, but that could have been luck.
>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> On May 8, 2019, at 10:44 PM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>> # ECHIDNA configuration
>>>>>> index.html?specStatus=WD;shortName=json-ld11 respec
>>>>> idk if this changes anything but according to https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna-with-ReSpec-and-GitHub#actually-publishing this should be
>>>>> # ECHIDNA configuration
>>>>> index.html?specStatus=WD&shortName=json-ld11 respec
>>>>> i.e., s/;/&/
>>>>> hth, simon
>>>>> ---
>>>>> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
>>>>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>>>>> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>>>>> Am 2019-05-08 18:22, schrieb Gregg Kellogg:
>>>>>> There’s an issue with Echidna which is delaying the update of the specs.
>>>>>> The failure was noted on the mailing list [1], and I filed a bug
>>>>>> report [2]. Unfortunately, no response as of yet.
>>>>>> As you can see, it seems to think this isn’t a WD and is running
>>>>>> Specberus rather than ReSpec; the ECHIDNA configuration is unchanged
>>>>>> from the last publication.
>>>>>> Once this is resolved, I’ll attempt to publish API and Framing specs too.
>>>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2019May/0002.html
>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/w3c/echidna/issues/669
>>> <echidna.PNG>

Received on Friday, 10 May 2019 04:59:56 UTC