- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:59:22 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=6sEeE-w2=M3iBpH16epa7Dn5qRr-0TcaVZ9Q8kSOcsVg@mail.gmail.com>
Apologies that I was unable to make the call. I am at the GlobalFact5 conference of fact checking organizations. Let me share a miniature trip report instead. Facebook have committed to publishing and consuming Schema.org's fact check markup ("ClaimReview"). This is most likely to be initially in JSON-LD (1.0) since most are using that. I would imagine it is best to avoid confusing things by talking about 1.1 or 2.0 in these early conversations. I was also at a Wikidata/Wikibase workshop last week where we tried to create parallel schemas in Wikidata and in Schema.org for funding/projects/grants etc. It turns out that one of the biggest friction points is that Wikidata internally have a PropertyGraphs-like model for annotating graph edges, which is awkward to reflect out into simple-minded RDF. Not saying JSON-LD needs to do this, just sharing a data point. cheers, Dan p.s. could I plead for the WG name in email Subject: lines for minutes/agendas? On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 at 07:08, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > The meeting minutes are here: > > https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2018/2018-06-22-json-ld > > Cheers > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > >
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2018 06:59:58 UTC