- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:59:22 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=6sEeE-w2=M3iBpH16epa7Dn5qRr-0TcaVZ9Q8kSOcsVg@mail.gmail.com>
Apologies that I was unable to make the call. I am at the GlobalFact5
conference of fact checking organizations. Let me share a miniature trip
report instead. Facebook have committed to publishing and consuming
Schema.org's fact check markup ("ClaimReview"). This is most likely to be
initially in JSON-LD (1.0) since most are using that. I would imagine it is
best to avoid confusing things by talking about 1.1 or 2.0 in these early
conversations. I was also at a Wikidata/Wikibase workshop last week where
we tried to create parallel schemas in Wikidata and in Schema.org for
funding/projects/grants etc. It turns out that one of the biggest friction
points is that Wikidata internally have a PropertyGraphs-like model for
annotating graph edges, which is awkward to reflect out into simple-minded
RDF. Not saying JSON-LD needs to do this, just sharing a data point.
cheers,
Dan
p.s. could I plead for the WG name in email Subject: lines for
minutes/agendas?
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 at 07:08, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> The meeting minutes are here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2018/2018-06-22-json-ld
>
> Cheers
>
> Ivan
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2018 06:59:58 UTC