Re: Agenda for 27 May 2025

Hello all,
Regrets from me. I am having a rather bad flu. 🤧 
Best regards,
Nico 


Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> schreef op 27 mei 2025 10:41:20 CEST:
>Hello,
>
>Apologies for the tardy agenda. I thought I sent this on Sunday when I sent the QT4CG agenda, but apparently, I didn’t.
>
>Meeting: Invisible XML Community Group
>Chair: Steven
>Scribe: John
>Present:
>Regrets: David; Bethan is at risk
>
>Agenda: 
>
>Topic: Accept the minutes of the previous meeting
>
>Previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/04/29-ixml-minutes
>
>Topic: Review of open actions
>
>2023-01-10-f: NTW to produce draft documentation of the XML vocabulary, issue #137
>https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/137
>
>2024-03-05-c: SP to prepare pull request to resolve issue #139 (new grammars, new README)
>
>2024-10-01-f: SP to make a PR for both versions of the RFC grammar
>https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/139
>
>2024-10-01-e: SP to review ixml tests and correct the grammar
>
>2025-04-15-a: NW to try to clarify “parse tree” in the specification in a way that is satisfactory to everyone
>
>2025-04-29: SP to see if the GLL parser he mentioned is open source
>
>Topic: Status reports
>
>Topic: New open issues
>
>Topic: Perspectives on serialization
>
>  See https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/296
>
>  Preview: https://invisiblexml.org/pr/296/index.html
>     Diffs: https://invisiblexml.org/pr/296/autodiff.html
>
>Topic: Use pragmas for the prolog?
>
>Requirements document:
>
>   https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/blob/master/proposals/pragma_req.md
>
>At the previous meetings, we had consensus for items 1-18. The remaining items
>are:
>
>19. A pragma’s attachment to a specific syntactic construct must be unambiguous
>    to software for parsing iXML grammars.
>
>20. The relationship between a pragma and the construct it attaches to should be
>    clear and unambiguous to human readers, in both iXML and XML notation.
>
>See also:
>  https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/265: Use pragmas for the prolog?
>  https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/254: Extend the prolog to support arbitrary metadata
>  https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/235: Problems with the prolog
>  https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/234: Alternate syntaxes for the prolog
>
>Topic: A subtraction operator
>
>See https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/249
>
>Topic: Next meeting
>
>Normal date and time for ixml meetings is every other Tuesday at 3 pm British
>Summer Time, 4 pm Central European Summer Time (14:00 UTC during summer time,
>15:00 UTC during winter time).
>
>On the usual schedule, the next meeting would be Tuesday, 10 June, at 14:00 UTC
>for one hour.
>
>Topic: Any other business
>
>For the record: the current state of the minute-taking rota is:
>
>+ John Lumley, 2025-03-18
>+ Norm Tovey-Walsh, 2025-03-15
>+ Steven Pemberton, 2025-04-29
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
>--
>Norm Tovey-Walsh
>Saxonica
>