- From: Graydon Saunders <graydonish@fastmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:02:45 -0400
- To: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2025 15:03:10 UTC
One vote for "ixml".
("iX" requires the antique Roman to have hiccups if we're going to say "nine-ml". Wouldn't want that.)
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, at 10:38, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> There’s some question about whether we should spell the common abbreviation for Invisible XML as “ixml” or “iXML”[1].
>
> The CG seems to be divided. I wonder if the readers on the list will express an overwhelming preference? Feel free to reply to me or to this message. I’ll try to tally up the results.
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> [1] https://github.com/invisiblexml/ixml/issues/302
>
> --
> Norm Tovey-Walsh
> Saxonica
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2025 15:03:10 UTC