Re: possible additions to our existing examples?

 > I believe several people are working on automatic generation of
 > transformations to go from vXML back to the notation described by an
 > iXML grammar, but I believe that most existing transforms of that class
 > have been constructed manually.

Certainly not in my case. I still have some edge cases to deal with, like

 optional-character: -~[].

which deletes exactly one character from the input, but you don't know what 
it was, and have to replace it with *something*, but otherwise all examples 
in my paper were generated automatically.

Steven

Received on Friday, 9 August 2024 17:18:24 UTC