Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog

John Lumley <john@saxonica.com> writes:
> Why not use % - we don’t use it for anything else. And what about
> considering the prolog to be a property map, eg.
>
> %ixml version: “1.2”, foo: “bar” %

I’d be reluctant to define the prolog as exclusively a set of name-value
pairs. It’s the obvious place to put any structures that apply to an
entire grammar.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica