Re: Superfluous conformance requirement

Ah! Well, then it disappears altogether then because an insertion is now a different thing.
Steven

On Wednesday 25 May 2022 11:22:12 (+02:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:

> Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> writes:
> > Related.
> > "A charset must not be marked as included (^) (error S05)."
> >
> > But as we confirmed yesterday, a string and hex may be so marked
> > ^"foo", ^#a0, I now no longer see why we have this restriction on
> > charsets.
>
> In the process of changing the mark for insertions from “^” to “+”, that
> sentence got reworded incorrectly. It should read:
>
> "A charset must not be marked as inserted (+) (error S05)."
>
> That’s what S05 is about.
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norm Tovey-Walsh
> Saxonica
>
-- 

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2022 10:15:12 UTC