- From: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:13:47 +0100
- To: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 14:14:05 UTC
On 24/05/2022 15:09, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: >> <prolog> >> <version number="1.0"/> >> </prolog> >> >> I personally vote for the first. > I don’t feel strongly about it. I’d probably prefer the latter except > that @number isn’t terribly appealing to me. Are we going to mandate that the version is a number/ or a multiply-dotted digit sequence ? -- *John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE john@saxonica.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 14:14:05 UTC