- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
 - Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:19 +0000
 - To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
 - Message-Id: <1653400508590.1917976239.4085771864@cwi.nl>
 
So the question is, what do we want as the serialisation of the prolog?
     <prolog version="1.0"/>
or
    <prolog>
       <version number="1.0"/>
    </prolog>
I personally vote for the first.
Steven
On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:51:23 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote:
That email got sent before I had finished: ctrl-return send s the mail 
apparently, so the commentary on @version is not yet complete.
Steven
On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:50:18 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote:
 > 
Steven to revert 
wording to attribute
Done
 > 
Steven to add wording forbidding xmlns
Done
 > 
Steven to insert 
Michael's ambiguity text
Done
 > 
Steven to contact Prague.
Done; 
no reply as yet.
 > 
Steven to add 
version declaration
Done. 
However, I note that this adds several conformance 
criteria that we should probably discuss at the meeting.
I 
also made one change: 
all meaningful content ends in attributes in the XML serialisation of ixml, 
so I used
      
     
prolog = version, s.
         @version = -"ixml", RS, -"version", RS, -string, s, -'.' 
.
-- 
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 13:57:32 UTC