- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:19 +0000
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1653400508590.1917976239.4085771864@cwi.nl>
So the question is, what do we want as the serialisation of the prolog?
<prolog version="1.0"/>
or
<prolog>
<version number="1.0"/>
</prolog>
I personally vote for the first.
Steven
On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:51:23 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote:
That email got sent before I had finished: ctrl-return send s the mail
apparently, so the commentary on @version is not yet complete.
Steven
On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:50:18 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote:
>
Steven to revert
wording to attribute
Done
>
Steven to add wording forbidding xmlns
Done
>
Steven to insert
Michael's ambiguity text
Done
>
Steven to contact Prague.
Done;
no reply as yet.
>
Steven to add
version declaration
Done.
However, I note that this adds several conformance
criteria that we should probably discuss at the meeting.
I
also made one change:
all meaningful content ends in attributes in the XML serialisation of ixml,
so I used
prolog = version, s.
@version = -"ixml", RS, -"version", RS, -string, s, -'.'
.
--
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 13:57:32 UTC