- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:19 +0000
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1653400508590.1917976239.4085771864@cwi.nl>
So the question is, what do we want as the serialisation of the prolog? <prolog version="1.0"/> or <prolog> <version number="1.0"/> </prolog> I personally vote for the first. Steven On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:51:23 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote: That email got sent before I had finished: ctrl-return send s the mail apparently, so the commentary on @version is not yet complete. Steven On Tuesday 24 May 2022 15:50:18 (+02:00), Steven Pemberton wrote: > Steven to revert wording to attribute Done > Steven to add wording forbidding xmlns Done > Steven to insert Michael's ambiguity text Done > Steven to contact Prague. Done; no reply as yet. > Steven to add version declaration Done. However, I note that this adds several conformance criteria that we should probably discuss at the meeting. I also made one change: all meaningful content ends in attributes in the XML serialisation of ixml, so I used prolog = version, s. @version = -"ixml", RS, -"version", RS, -string, s, -'.' . --
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 13:57:32 UTC