Re: Earley dot notation for X+ and X* from M Joel Dubinko on 2022-07-26 (public-ixml@w3.org from July 2022)

From: M Joel Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:35:59 -0400
To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Message-Id: <25829661-D42D-4345-A210-C49DB8F87B60@dubinko.info>

OK. The wording in that section led me to believe those rules were more of a workaround than a mainstream approach. But based on Michael’s message, it looks more commonly used than I suspected.

Thanks, all!

-j

> On Jul 26, 2022, at 8:01 AM, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
> 
> Actually, the spec gives a hint to what I do: I rewrite the rules to pure alternative form.
>  http://invisiblexml.org/1.0/#hints

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2022 15:36:18 UTC