- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:35:22 -0700
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
Steven Pemberton writes: > On Tuesday 18 January 2022 14:51:52 (+01:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: > >> Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> writes: >> > You can already add colons to names without changing anything else. It >> > doesn't make the language ambiguous. >> > >> > I just tried it by adding colon to namefollower, and then parsing: >> > >> > abc:thing: abc:thing1, abc:thing2, abc:thing3; >> > abc:thing3, abc:thing2, abc:thing1. >> > abc:thing1: "a". >> > abc:thing2: "b". >> > abc:thing3: "c". >> >> Now try >> >> abc:thing:thing1: abc:thing2 > Done. > > abc:def:ing: abc:def:thing1, abc:def:thing2, abc:def:thing3; > abc:def:thing3, abc:def:thing2, abc:def:thing1. > abc:def:thing1: "a". > abc:def:thing2: "b". > abc:def:thing3: "c". I think a:b:c. is a simpler example. Is this equivalent to a = b:c. or to a:b = c. ? -- C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2022 16:35:52 UTC