Re: non-XML characters (e.g. #1)

• From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
• Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:10:43 +0000
• To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, "Norm Tovey-Walsh" <norm@saxonica.com>
• Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <1641229562688.891749789.1058732269@cwi.nl>

On Monday 03 January 2022 17:40:36 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 16:31, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> wrote:

> > All Steven is saying is that if you write a grammar that accepts input
> > that contains C0 control characters, you better make sure all the C0
> > control charactesr get omitted if you’re going to make XML at the end of
> > the day.
>
> Which is at the heart of my objection.
I'm afraid I'm failing to understand your objection. You said someone was messing with your data, but I can't see who.

> No Norm, because it seems you're accepting the spec, with non-XML
> characters as 'good to go'. 

They're not good to go, they're good to come.

Steven

Received on Monday, 3 January 2022 17:11:06 UTC