Re: Open issue: error codes

"Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@fromoldbooks.org> writes:
> I'd be even happier with ixml-e-s001; the reason is that it's more
> amenable to a Web search.

Surely, “ixml s001” is sufficient for a modern search engine? Especially
given that there aren’t going to be tens of thousands of pages of
ancillary material with different error codes.

I’m not even sure ixml-e-s001 would be better; I have no idea how the
search engines treat “-” vs “ ”.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica