- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:12:34 +0100
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 18 April 2022 09:18:16 UTC
See: https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/66 I think we should adopt this proposal. Setting aside the question of whether or not users *really* need namespaces in ixml, they’re going to expect namespaces in an XML specification. I have been persuaded that if we don’t do it in 1.0, we will be pressured to do it in V.next and when we cave to that pressure, we’ll do exactly what this proposal suggests, so we might as well just do it now. I am strongly in favor of adding a single default namespace declaration, but I’m in favor of accepting the proposal even without it. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Monday, 18 April 2022 09:18:16 UTC