Re: no empty iXML prologs

Tom Hillman <> writes:
> * multiple version declarations
> * version declarations not at the start of the prolog

Blech. “No.”

> I am intrigued by the idea of Michael showing us something wonderful
> I've not considered, but if not, maybe allowing an empty prolog isn't
> terrible?

I don’t mind if we do it combinatorially for version and namespaces. It
won’t scale, but we can cross that bridge in the future.

But I also don’t lose any sleep over <prolog/> so…

                                        Be seeing you,

Norm Tovey-Walsh

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2022 16:51:37 UTC