Open proposals, any objections?


AFAICT, there are three open proposals for new enhancments/features
for Invisible XML 1.0.

+ Is the distinction between "s" and "S" insufficient from an accessibility point of view
+ Simple Namespaces Proposal
+ Optional version declaration?

Is there anyone opposed to any of these? Selfishly, I’d like to see them
accepted tomorrow so that I can carve out a little time over the spring
holiday to update my implementation.

I don’t think there are any other substantive proposals waiting in the
wings, so if we could accept these tomorrow, we could also turn our
attention in the next few weeks to tidying things up and preparing to
announce a 1.0 release in Prague.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norm Tovey-Walsh

Received on Monday, 11 April 2022 09:50:05 UTC