- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 17:58:33 +0100
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2022 17:02:08 UTC
> Any language in which the default behavior cannot be explicitly named > has a gap and is suspect. I agree completely. So completely, in fact, that my implementation simply makes the default explicit internally while constructing its object model so that it doesn’t have to know about default values from there on out. Needless to say, when I changed the insertion character from “+” to “^” and began treating all text marked with “^” as an insertion, things went very, very badly wrong. I am becoming more and more unsatisfied with overloading “^” this way. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2022 17:02:08 UTC