- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:57:55 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 08:50, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > The message collects together all terminal symbols (characters) that could > occur at that point. If there is only one, it is required. If there are > more than one, then there is a choice, and none is required, and all are > possible. > > Is there a better wording that would make this clearer? I take your point. "Required, one of " when it's a set? Even when it's 5 characters, one of them is required? Could be I'm used to xml parsers? @ndw - what wording is used in docbook? Generally 'one of' many 'required'? I.e. it is invalid without one of the following. HTH > > Steven > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:08:31 +0100, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 20:32, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> > > wrote: > >> > >> Do you mean a nonterminal? > > > > Not particularly. If known, tell me what is required at this point in > > the syntax? > > Or is that the same as 'permitted'? > > Difference between 'must have' and 'may have'? > > > > regards > > > > > >> > >> Steven > >> > >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:00:18 +0100, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > ^ > >> > *** Permitted at this position: " "; "ΒΆ"; [".;:,'?!"]; [L]. > >> > > >> > Would it be more helpful (if appropriate) to report > >> > xxx required at this position? > >> > > >> > regards > >> > > > > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2021 08:58:19 UTC