Re: Grammar validation?

On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 23:30, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <
cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote:

> Dave,
>
> I’m not sure I understand what you are saying or asking about n and m.
> Can you give an example?  (If Steven’s earlier answer has cleared
> everything
> up, feel free to ignore this inquiry.)


Take html, doc/div/div vs doc/div
Same element different location within the tree.
In xml this is allowed. Is it allowed in i xml?
Ie. Same name, different xpath location.
 I don’t think it is with the current spec?

Regards




>
> Michael
>
> > On 7,Nov2021, at 5:14 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steven.
> >
> > =====================
> > Spec.
> >
> > The grammar must not contain more than one rule defining any given
> > name. {needed?}
> > May contradict nonterminals defn
> > This name refers to the rule that defines this name, which must exist,
> > and there must only be one such rule.
> >
> > Which disallows names n and m, each having a different xpath location
> > in the tree?
> > Is this intended?
> >
> > regards
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 11:51, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure. From the tutorial there is a link where you can upload an ixml
> >> grammar, and a sample input.
> >> See http://www.cwi.nl/~steven/ixml/tutorial and go to the page "How it
> >> works".
> >>
> >> Steven
> >>
> >> On Sunday 07 November 2021 12:00:49 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote:
> >>
> >>> If I try to write a grammar for some input, is there any way I can
> >> validate
> >>> what I've written please?
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Pawson
> > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> > Docbook FAQ.
> >
>
> --
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.