- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 21:53:40 +0000
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Sunday 07 November 2021 13:14:58 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote:
> Thanks Steven.
>
> =====================
> Spec.
>
> The grammar must not contain more than one rule defining any given
> name. {needed?}
> May contradict nonterminals defn
> This name refers to the rule that defines this name, which must exist,
> and there must only be one such rule.
>
> Which disallows names n and m, each having a different xpath location
> in the tree?
> Is this intended?
Yes. What is says is that if you have a rule
a: m, n.
there must be exactly one rule
m: ...
and one rule
n: ...
The reason that {needed?} is there, is because I believe the second rule
covers the first rule.
Steven
>
> regards
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 11:51, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
wrote:
> >
> > Sure. From the tutorial there is a link where you can upload an ixml
> > grammar, and a sample input.
> > See http://www.cwi.nl/~steven/ixml/tutorial and go to the page "How it
> > works".
> >
> > Steven
> >
> > On Sunday 07 November 2021 12:00:49 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote:
> >
> > > If I try to write a grammar for some input, is there any way I can
> > validate
> > > what I've written please?
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2021 21:53:56 UTC