- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:09:56 +0000
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 16:02, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote: > > Dave, good point. > > Both Tom Hillman (Jay Parser) and I (Aparecium) are working on ixml > implementations that are intended to be callable from XSLT. The > current initial implementation of Aparecium is XQuery, but I expect to > get around to making an XSLT version ‘real soon now’. (And if memory > serves, Saxon allows XQuery functions to be called from XSLT, though > I’ve never actually done that …) Mike has a full suite. Json, xml and both via xquery if needed (he implemented both). > > And yes, running an ixml parser that provides a coarse analysis, and > then processing, and then running an ixml parser with a different grammar > in individual segments, is a style of usage I think makes sense. I've certainly used this form, parsing 'plain text' input as xml. > > At the moment, though, Aparecium is too slow to be anything but a toy > for playing with, while dreaming of the day when we have something > usable in a production system. I'm sure all such software started out as a toy, then grewed and grewed? Good luck. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2021 16:10:20 UTC