W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ixml@w3.org > July 2021

Re: resolving ambiguity

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 13:24:49 +0000
Message-Id: <1618494496857.467849143.681448170@cwi.nl>
To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, Aleksei Guzev <aleksei@guzev.pro>
Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
 > If as a grammar writer I care which parse tree is produced, then I 
should write a grammar in which no sentence is ambiguous.

Exactly. We are friendly enough to produce a serialization, and to mention 
that it is ambiguous. Specifying which serialization is produced is too 
difficult: it depends so much on which parsing algorithm is used. I think 
it is fine as it is, as long as we can agree how best to specify the 
constraint that all available input is consumed.

Received on Thursday, 1 July 2021 13:25:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 1 July 2021 13:25:19 UTC