- From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:29:13 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>,John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, SM <sm@resistor.net>,Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
- Cc: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
At 19:44 06/01/2013, Larry Masinter wrote: >The question and your interests presume the lack of interest is in >the topic. But this is not the case. Rather, There is a lack of >interest in working within the IETF process. This is a very interesting statement when I confront it to my personal field current experience. The IETF' switch from the better internet to the more market palatable internet (Aug 29th) might actually correspond to this. Like a change wehad before from ITU to IETF. This time it is from internationalization to multilingualization (as a general metaphore in many disciplines). It might not mean many new SDOs but a possible switch from internationalizing (Unicode, IETF, etc.) to multilingualizing entities, actually from localization to subsidiarity. I personnally locate the change at RFC 5895. The innetwork is stable, reliable, etc. the outnetwork is adaptative, at least on a community basis. Languages are good examples of existing communities. Technologies may also be (ipads, linux, etc). Architures may also be. I experiment the concept with the small IUse community slow emergence (Intelligent Use system extensions). jfc
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 14:29:51 UTC