W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > January 2013

Re: fate of IRI working group in IETF

From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:35:43 +0800
Message-ID: <CC7EFBD7B4624A758EC5BE32AB983B27@LENOVO47E041CF>
To: <public-iri@w3.org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SM" <sm@resistor.net>
To: "Larry Masinter" <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: fate of IRI working group in IETF


> Hi Larry,
> At 17:49 08-11-2012, Larry Masinter wrote:
>>Background:
>>* I have been disappointed by the lack of participation, energy, 
>>document reviews in the IETF IRI working group; a working group 
>>which doesn't have significant active participation and document 
>>review should be shut  (rather than trying to maintain the illusion 
>>of progress)
> 
> Working Groups discussing about internationalization tend to suffer 
> from lack of participation.  I listened to the arguments about the 
> importance of doing the work.  It doesn't change the fact that there 
> isn't any energy to do the work.
> 
>

it is an important work, but why  do few people paritcipate in this WG?

is it due to that the importance of this work is not recognized by every involved person?

Jiankang Yao
>
> Regards,
> -sm
> 
> 
> 
>
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 02:32:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:45 UTC