Re: Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard

On 21/08/13 16:45, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I doubt that would be true for subdomains. E.g. I know people using
> http://☺.example.com/ as domain (forgot whether that particular code
> point is excluded, but you get the idea).

Shame for them. The writing has been on the wall here for long enough
that they should not be at all surprised when this stops working.

Gerv

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 08:35:26 UTC