Re: fate of IRI working group in IETF

• From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:03:32 -0800
• To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
• Cc: public-iri@w3.org
• Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121113012523.0b80e558@resistor.net>

Hi Larry,
At 17:49 08-11-2012, Larry Masinter wrote:
>Background:
>* I have been disappointed by the lack of participation, energy, 
>document reviews in the IETF IRI working group; a working group 
>which doesn't have significant active participation and document 
>review should be shut  (rather than trying to maintain the illusion 
>of progress)

Working Groups discussing about internationalization tend to suffer 
from lack of participation.  I listened to the arguments about the 
importance of doing the work.  It doesn't change the fact that there 
isn't any energy to do the work.

Regards,
-sm

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 10:18:40 UTC