- From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 16:35:14 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-05-05 00:04, Larry Masinter wrote: > > I think it is in scope to fix the registration guidelines to clarify the registration > process, in areas where registrants often make mistakes. > > > > This is one of them. > > > > == proposed add == > > "In general, a URI or an IRI can be thought of as consisting of > > <scheme>:<scheme-specific-part>#<fragment>. > > > > However, the registration defines<scheme> and the syntax and semantics > of<fragment> depends only on the media type of the representation accessed. > New scheme definitions MUST NOT define syntax or semantics of fragment > identifiers; that is, registration specifications should define the syntax > of<scheme-specific-part> and its meaning for each<scheme> defined. > > ==end proposed add== > > Sounds good to me. That looks good to me too. -Dave
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 16:35:50 UTC