- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:52:25 -0000
- To: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines@tools.ietf.org, duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp, shawnste@microsoft.com, adil@diwan.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
#121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Comment (by duerst@…): (from Larry) My read on the situation: It would be helpful if we could get some agreed text describing the nature of the problem -- it sounds to me that there might be agreement on the problem (more or less) , just not on whether there are feasible (partial) solutions. If we have agreement on the problem statement, then we can: * document partial solutions (with caveats) * say we don't believe there are any feasible solutions at this time It would be useful also to get a survey of of what current implementations actually are doing now, along with some concrete examples of the nature of the problems. > > I really need an way, even optional if need be, of rendering for RT before I can "sign off" on this draft :) There's no magic, just "rough consensus and running code": * if all of the implementations agree, then we can document that. * If there are multiple implementations currently, we can try to pick one. * if we don't like any of the implementations, we can say so. * If there are no implementations or even demos or samples of implementations, we shouldn't hold our breath hoping one will appear. Larry -- ---------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: shawnste@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines@… Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bidi- | Version: guidelines | Resolution: Severity: - | Keywords: bidi | ---------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/121#comment:6> iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 07:53:06 UTC